Motley Fool's Rule Breakers, Rule Makers-The Foolish Guide to Picking Stocks by David & Tom Gardner

The Motley Fool's pose as the "fools" who point outthe future is not so easy without a crystal ball.
the foibles of the "wise" (those in power) isAnd both David and Tom warn that you'll still lose
entertaining, but in this book they fail to point out themoney on some losers -- or perhaps their lawyers
Emperor's biggest invisible "garment" -- capital gains.insisted they add that. And to their credit they agree
They pose as the champions of us small investors,that the small cap stocks, which are certainly more
but fall into the same growth-in-market-price trap thespeculative and risky than the large cap stocks,
Wall Street establishment wants us locked into.should be only a small portion of your overall portfolio.
Oh, from that perspective, they give lots of goodYet even with the large cap Rule Makers, you'll invest
advice. I have no doubt that anybody who follows allin more losers than winners.
their guidelines will find stocks that will go up in price.This book was written during the market euphoria of
Though I seriously doubt that more than a tinymid-1998, and so the Fool also fall into what Dr.
fraction of this book's readers follow all their rulesJeremy J Siegel in THE FUTURE FOR INVESTORS
(they lay out a lot of rules in this book).calls the "Growth Trap." That is, overpaying for
I have no doubt that David and Tom are sincere instocks because of their prospects for growth. The
their intention to empower small investors, I justFool brag about not paying any attention to a stock's
believe that most small investors who want to followP/E (or Price/Earnings ratio). If your research shows
their advice take the logical short cut -- they go toa stock is a rule breaker or rule maker company, you
the Fool's website and see what the brothers areshould buy it without worrying about the price. This is
recommending now.asking for poor returns -- even if the stock grows as
David and Tom can't be faulted for this -- gurus andyou expect.
teachers of all kinds have pushed forThis was a common delusion during the dot com
student-independence only to be thwarted byboom -- the Internet was growing so fast, how could
student-dependence . . . probably since the firstprime Internet stocks not be worth whatever the
fire-master tried to get his students to try newmarket was asking?
ways to barbecue a sabre-tooth tiger's steak.As the Fool put it -- "At what point this century
Yet who can fault the students? All this research,should the investor in a spectacular business like
analysis, application of ratios, studying of businessCoca-Cola or Schering Plough or Hershey's or Johnson
plans, deciding whether a given company is a true& Johnson have worried about the immediate
rule breaker or faker breaker . . . takes a lot of time.valuation of their stock stubs?"
Time which -- I'd argue -- would be better spentThe answer should be obvious -- at the time they
either making more money in a part time endeavorplanned to buy said stock stubs.
or just enjoying activities with your family.After that, they should cash their dividend checks
That's why so many people send their money off toand pay no attention to the market price -- which is
mutual fund managers in the first place -- theyfar less attention than the Fool pay to "immediate
believe they don't know enough to buy individualvaluation."
stocks. Or they know that buying many stocks isAnd it's clear from the context in the book that The
less risky than buying the stock of one or a fewMotley Fool assumes that good stocks are simply
companies. The Motley Fool ignore the risk of buyingthose that go up in price. So at bottom, The Motley
individual companies and the benefits ofFool advocate that put your money into investments
diversification, which they say is overrated.that may not return you any money until you sell.
From the standpoint of Modern Portfolio Theory,I don't recall seeing the word "dividend" anywhere in
they stand accused of encouraging people to takethis book. Maybe I missed it, but any mention of
on more risk than necessary . . . with the hope thatdividends was not important to rate a listing in the
their one winner out of four will make up for theindex.
three losers.They praise the rise in market price of Coca-Cola,
The book is divided into two parts. The first isbut don't point out that not only has its market price
written by David and tells you how to find stockshave gone up tremendously over the years, it has
that are "Rule Breakers." That is, small companiespaid out an ever-increasing amount of income.
that have revolutionary products that are going toSo Tom fails to bring on what in my opinion is a
kick the rear-ends of their industry giants and growprime attribute of "Rule Makers" you want to invest
the companies into powerhouses.in -- they share their success by paying an
There's a lot of good advice that should help suchever-increasing amount of dividends to stock holders.
"foolish" investors avoid many obvious losers.I applaud the Fool's criticisms of mutual funds.
However, you will also have to learn how to tell aHowever, they make no mention of exchange
promising rule breaker from a faker breaker such astraded funds, which have the advantages of mutual
Boston Chicken.funds without the disadvantages of actively managed
Once a company has grown past the rule breakermutual funds.
stage, it becomes a tweener and either dies or goesEFTs were not as popular when this book was
on to become a rule maker. Tom writes the secondwritten in 1998 as they are now, but Spiders (an EFT
half devoted to finding these Rule Makers --that tracks the performance of the S&P 500
companies large and sucessful enough to dominateindex) had been available for 5 years old. But a simple
their industries.way to invest in the broad market is too easy for
He explains a lot of criteria, all of which make a lot ofthese brothers. The Fool would rather have you
sense. (Though I think many accountants could arguespend your evenings analyzing annual reports.
with the Foolish Flow. Yes, excess inventory is bad.If you really enjoy the game of researching
But stores need some inventory if they plan to opencompanies and picking individual stocks, and you have
their doors tomorrow. So how much is too much?the time to indulge in such luxuries, allocate a small
Same with accounts receivable and accounts payable.portion of your total portfolio to the Fool's
He turns these accounting rules upside down.)investment plan. Research and analyze to your
Yet, when all's said and done, you still need a lot ofheart's content. Have fun. (Meanwhile, I'll be on a
insight into the businesses of these companies totropical beach).
properly evaluate them -- and most of us don't haveBut please keep the vast majority of your money in
that, certainly not for every industry. After you usediversified interest and dividend paying investments.
the math to choose potential winners, you still needAfter 10 years, compare the money you've received
some good judgment to pick the ones you think willfrom your income portfolio with that of your "Foolish"
win.portfolio. I bet you'll be glad that you kept 95% of
Analysing successful companies in easy in hindsight.your money invested in proven income investments.
Predicting which ones will survive and thrive far intoAnd maybe you'll head for your own tropical beach.