Money for Nothing: Why

In a world that is moving evermore toward thepay for it. The larger the potential market, the
internet, industries are having to adapt at angreater the need for a diversity of marketing
accelerated rate, and this is true in the realm of realchannels to ensure that exposure is maximized. And
estate as well. Many sellers are moving towardhere's where the limited-service model loses traction:
internet real estate brokers, who promise results forjust adding a property to a list is not, by definition,
a flat fee, eroding real estate commissions, butmarketing.
perhaps eroding equity as well.Even if all the property data has been input correctly,
Copyright (c) 2007 Jesse Mooreenabling comparison to competing properties, and
Is there anything in your experience that hasassuming there is at least one photo of the property,
prepared you to expect something for nothing? No?the reality is that a multiple listing service is just that:
What a revolting revelation! But it seems to bean ever-evolving, growing list. It is a set of data
universally true-you get what you pay for-nothingregarding the particulars of properties within a
more, nothing less. Well, sometimes much less.market. Granted, the Internet has made it possible to
Occasionally more-maybe the folks from "Antiquesdistribute those lists to a wider audience, but this
Roadshow" can provide a few anecdotes-the $5assumes again that all the information has been input
garage sale find that should be insured for $17,000,correctly, that there are multiple, useful and appealing
for example. However, I think we all know thatphotos, and that a modestly competent copywriter
these are the exception rather than the rule.has taken the time to write some decent lines about
So why is it that when it comes to real estate, forthe property so that the average prospective buyer
many there is an overwhelming compulsion to believemight be at least compelled to take a look. My
they may be the one beat the system? Maybe it'sexperience says otherwise.
because the perceived rewards are potentially great,I was introduced to a property three weeks ago by
and this is the primary niche that most of themy partner when he recommended I take a look at
discount brokerages seem to have targeted their"this awesome piece of real estate." On the way
message to. Realistically, I believe there will always beback from another appointment, I stopped by to see
a segment of the market that has a need towhat he was talking about and was fortunate to find
maintain control, regardless of the costs in time andthe sellers home. They gave me a tour of their
money. And they certainly earn that right-payingbeautiful grounds and the spacious, if somewhat
dearly in reduced sale prices relative to the market.dated, home. The property was to die for. The
According to the NAR, FSBO (For Sale By Owner)home needed some attention to bring it up to
sales were down in 2006, from 13% of sellers incurrent decorating standards, but the primary issues
2005 going it alone to 12% in 2006. This wouldwere flooring and paint which are easy fixes. The
suggest that the shifting market has persuadedsellers acknowledged they had been banking on the
some sellers that the rewards of an unrepresentedappeal of the property and were slowly realizing that
sale are diminishing as the requirements of marketingour current market is not the ‘run and gun' model
a home, negotiating the transaction, and shepherdingmany sellers have come to expect from the past
all parties and paperwork through escrow hasfew years.
become more time and resource intensive.When I got back to the office, I pulled up the listing
Based on this and the fact that nationally the housingand was surprised to find that the home had been
market has slowed relative to the past five to sixlisted originally for 27 days with a single photo-shot
years of a decidedly seller-slanted market, I havefrom 1/2 an acre away-slightly blurry and not at all
begun to wonder what the draw could possibly bedescriptive of the park-like grounds. When the
for those sellers who elect to go with a discount orproperty was canceled and relisted with the same
limited-service brokerage. I realize we're pushing ablurry photos, the sellers gave me a call to ask if I
very large rock up a steep and slippery slope, but itwould be willing to meet with them to discuss taking
seems to me that the disconnect starts with atheir listing. We set a time to meet, and I began
misconception about the job of an agent.assembling a customized listing presentation book,
Granted, years of comparison to the crusty used carspecific to his situation and property. The morning we
lot crowd hasn't helped our image, but the latestwere to meet, he left a voice message saying he
divergence in business models from limited/discountwanted to postpone as they had decided, after
to full-service and the range of options in betweenreceiving feedback from a few folks, to replace the
has served to further cloud what were alreadyvintage red shag carpets and needed some time to
murky waters.get that done. We rescheduled for the following
However, what seems to be getting lost are theweek.
definitions of an agent. According to Webster's, anMeanwhile, the new issue of the book hit the stands,
agent is:and my partner received a call on this property,
1. One who acts for, or in the place of, another, byrequesting a showing. His new client expressed
authority from him; one entrusted with the businesssufficient interest in the property that they ultimately
of another; a substitute; a deputy; a factor.viewed it three times-no offer yet. Meanwhile, I had
2. An active power or cause; that which has thestopped by after vacation to refresh my memory
power to produce an effect, such as a physical,and take a few photos. While there, a couple of
chemical, or medicinal agent; as, heat is a powerfulagents stopped by, doing comps for a new listing
agent.they would be putting up. I eavesdropped on their
To my mind, these two are inseparable: an agentconversation, as they echoed the speaking points I
should both execute the business of another, actinghad begun outlining for my listing presentation-dated
in his place, with his authority, and producing ainterior, fabulous grounds, need for staging, etc.
physical effect-in this case resulting in the sale of aWe met to discuss listing his property (the original
property.listing agreement had expired three weeks prior to
To use the term ‘agent' in any other contextour meeting, but was still showing as Active on the
regarding a real estate transaction is misleading. WhileMLS), and while he appeared interested in my
a limited-service brokerage may have access to thepresentation and seemed to agree with the final
local multiple listing service (MLS) and is authorized toanalysis, the fact that he had seen some traffic
enter properties, its value ends once the propertyrecently (two agents previewing and my partner's
has been dutifully added to the list. Frequently, theythree showings) led him to believe he should stick to
offer no representation-leaving the seller to negotiatehis current course. (Did I mention we met on the
his own transaction. And as an agent of change, they80th day of his listing?)
don't market the property, because once it's on theThe most telling thing happened later that day when
list, their job is done. So in both measures of agency,my partner called to schedule his last showing; as
there is no connection between its actions and thethey were preparing to hang up, the seller told him,
title."Just let your buyers know we're not expecting a
But truly this is just the beginning of my concern. Thefull-price offer!"
term ‘marketing' is used generally to refer to theHad I been representing this seller, I would have lost
activities of making a product visible to a market.my mind! Imagine giving up that vital piece of
Whether it's widgets or wigs, pumpkins or property,information-to the guy you're going to negotiate
the concept remains the same-in a free marketagainst. Worse yet, imagine that they paid their
system, the greater the exposure, the more likely a‘agent' $1000 for the pleasure of his services.
true value will be determined by a public acting of itsWhat was it Cicero said? "Men decide far more
own free will, given access to comparable informationproblems by hate, love, lust, rage, sorrow, joy, hope,
about the specific products and available competingfear, illusion or some other inward emotion, than by
ones. Note that ultimately the value of a product orreality, authority, any legal standard, judicial
property is determined by what a buyer is willing toprecedent, or statute." It's still true today.