Money for Nothing - Why

Is there anything in your experience that hasjust adding a property to a list is not, by definition,
prepared you to expect something for nothing? No?marketing.
What a revolting revelation! But it seems to beEven if all the property data has been input correctly,
universally true-you get what you pay for-nothingenabling comparison to competing properties, and
more, nothing less. Well, sometimes much less.assuming there is at least one photo of the property,
Occasionally more-maybe the folks from "Antiquesthe reality is that a multiple listing service is just that:
Roadshow" can provide a few anecdotes-the $5an ever-evolving, growing list. It is a set of data
garage sale find that should be insured for $17,000,regarding the particulars of properties within a
for example. However, I think we all know thatmarket. Granted, the Internet has made it possible to
these are the exception rather than the rule.distribute those lists to a wider audience, but this
So why is it that when it comes to real estate, forassumes again that all the information has been input
many there is an overwhelming compulsion to believecorrectly, that there are multiple, useful and appealing
they may be the one beat the system? Maybe it'sphotos, and that a modestly competent copywriter
because the perceived rewards are potentially great,has taken the time to write some decent lines about
and this is the primary niche that most of thethe property so that the average prospective buyer
discount brokerages seem to have targeted theirmight be at least compelled to take a look. My
message to. Realistically, I believe there will always beexperience says otherwise.
a segment of the market that has a need toI was introduced to a property three weeks ago by
maintain control, regardless of the costs in time andmy partner when he recommended I take a look at
money. And they certainly earn that right-paying"this awesome piece of real estate." On the way
dearly in reduced sale prices relative to the market.back from another appointment, I stopped by to see
According to the NAR, FSBO (For Sale By Owner)what he was talking about and was fortunate to find
sales were down in 2006, from 13% of sellers inthe sellers home. They gave me a tour of their
2005 going it alone to 12% in 2006. This wouldbeautiful grounds and the spacious, if somewhat
suggest that the shifting market has persuadeddated, home. The property was to die for. The
some sellers that the rewards of an unrepresentedhome needed some attention to bring it up to
sale are diminishing as the requirements of marketingcurrent decorating standards, but the primary issues
a home, negotiating the transaction, and shepherdingwere flooring and paint which are easy fixes. The
all parties and paperwork through escrow hassellers acknowledged they had been banking on the
become more time and resource intensive.appeal of the property and were slowly realizing that
Based on this and the fact that nationally the housingour current market is not the 'run and gun' model
market has slowed relative to the past five to sixmany sellers have come to expect from the past
years of a decidedly seller-slanted market, I havefew years.
begun to wonder what the draw could possibly beWhen I got back to the office, I pulled up the listing
for those sellers who elect to go with a discount orand was surprised to find that the home had been
limited-service brokerage. I realize we're pushing alisted originally for 27 days with a single photo-shot
very large rock up a steep and slippery slope, but itfrom 1/2 an acre away-slightly blurry and not at all
seems to me that the disconnect starts with adescriptive of the park-like grounds. When the
misconception about the job of an agent.property was canceled and relisted with the same
Granted, years of comparison to the crusty used carblurry photos, the sellers gave me a call to ask if I
lot crowd hasn't helped our image, but the latestwould be willing to meet with them to discuss taking
divergence in business models from limited/discounttheir listing. We set a time to meet, and I began
to full-service and the range of options in betweenassembling a customized listing presentation book,
has served to further cloud what were alreadyspecific to his situation and property. The morning we
murky waters.were to meet, he left a voice message saying he
However, what seems to be getting lost are thewanted to postpone as they had decided, after
definitions of an agent. According to Webster's, anreceiving feedback from a few folks, to replace the
agent is:vintage red shag carpets and needed some time to
1. One who acts for, or in the place of, another, byget that done. We rescheduled for the following
authority from him; one entrusted with the businessweek.
of another; a substitute; a deputy; a factor.Meanwhile, the new issue of the book hit the stands,
2. An active power or cause; that which has theand my partner received a call on this property,
power to produce an effect, such as a physical,requesting a showing. His new client expressed
chemical, or medicinal agent; as, heat is a powerfulsufficient interest in the property that they ultimately
agent.viewed it three times-no offer yet. Meanwhile, I had
To my mind, these two are inseparable: an agentstopped by after vacation to refresh my memory
should both execute the business of another, actingand take a few photos. While there, a couple of
in his place, with his authority, and producing aagents stopped by, doing comps for a new listing
physical effect-in this case resulting in the sale of athey would be putting up. I eavesdropped on their
property.conversation, as they echoed the speaking points I
To use the term 'agent' in any other contexthad begun outlining for my listing presentation-dated
regarding a real estate transaction is misleading. Whileinterior, fabulous grounds, need for staging, etc.
a limited-service brokerage may have access to theWe met to discuss listing his property (the original
local multiple listing service (MLS) and is authorized tolisting agreement had expired three weeks prior to
enter properties, its value ends once the propertyour meeting, but was still showing as Active on the
has been dutifully added to the list. Frequently, theyMLS), and while he appeared interested in my
offer no representation-leaving the seller to negotiatepresentation and seemed to agree with the final
his own transaction. And as an agent of change, theyanalysis, the fact that he had seen some traffic
don't market the property, because once it's on therecently (two agents previewing and my partner's
list, their job is done. So in both measures of agency,three showings) led him to believe he should stick to
there is no connection between its actions and thehis current course. (Did I mention we met on the
title.80th day of his listing?)
But truly this is just the beginning of my concern. TheThe most telling thing happened later that day when
term 'marketing' is used generally to refer to themy partner called to schedule his last showing; as
activities of making a product visible to a market.they were preparing to hang up, the seller told him,
Whether it's widgets or wigs, pumpkins or property,"Just let your buyers know we're not expecting a
the concept remains the same-in a free marketfull-price offer!"
system, the greater the exposure, the more likely aHad I been representing this seller, I would have lost
true value will be determined by a public acting of itsmy mind! Imagine giving up that vital piece of
own free will, given access to comparable informationinformation-to the guy you're going to negotiate
about the specific products and available competingagainst. Worse yet, imagine that they paid their
ones. Note that ultimately the value of a product or'agent' $1000 for the pleasure of his services.
property is determined by what a buyer is willing toWhat was it Cicero said? "Men decide far more
pay for it. The larger the potential market, theproblems by hate, love, lust, rage, sorrow, joy, hope,
greater the need for a diversity of marketingfear, illusion or some other inward emotion, than by
channels to ensure that exposure is maximized. Andreality, authority, any legal standard, judicial
here's where the limited-service model loses traction:precedent, or statute." It's still true today.