Investing Vs Trading - A False Dichotomy

Recently, have you run across a growing number ofinvestor is to establish a set of rules and principles
references to the virtues of being a "committed"that are intelligent and fact-based, and then execute
investor instead of a "speculative" trader? I knowthem according to plan. Every so often, take a step
that I have.back to re-examine your goals and strategies to see
Here is a typical statement: "You cannot succeed ifwhether they still make sense. The bottom line is to
you trade a lot. You can only succeed by being antake a long-term view, but recognize that will
actual investor. You must realize that by owning asometimes lead to short-term activity. There is no
share of stock, you are in fact a partial owner of alogical contradiction in that.
real business. No business owner wants skittishThe Sensible Stock Investor holds some stocks for a
investors. Corporations want committed, interestedrelatively short time (measured in weeks) and other
investors who are going to look to the long term,stocks for years. What label should be put on that? I
support the company through thick and thin, and notwould suggest a label like "sensible." Or "buy-to-hold,"
sell the stock at the first sign of short-term problemsmeaning that the intent when purchasing a stock is
or bumps in the road."to hold it for a long time, but that you will sell it when
Well. As they say in The Godfather, "It's business,it stops achieving the goals you set for it.
not personal." Let's look at a few facts.From the corporation's point of view, what I (as a
First, some of the points in the statement above aresmall investor) do with my shares of stock is
true. If you buy a share of stock, you are, in fact,irrelevant. Owning a tiny share of a business is not
part owner of the business. Corporations generallythe same thing as having a controlling interest in the
would prefer shareholders with a long-term point ofbusiness. If I buy 100 shares of AT&T, I own
view. A long-term view does look right over and.00016% of the business. My ownership of those
beyond mere bumps in the road.shares gives me zero control over how the business
But other ideas are false or misleading. For one thing,is run. I don't have a seat on the Board, and
many active traders are, in fact successful. You canmanagement doesn't listen to anything I say.
succeed or fail if you trade stocks. It is probably trueNow if I were just starting out my own business,
that the majority of hyperactive traders do not beatand I had five angel investors, of course I would
the market, but that simply means they have faultywant them to be committed to my business, stand
strategies, or that they execute their strategiesbehind me, and not pull their investments out at the
poorly, or both. Many traders do beat the market,first sign of trouble. They would want me to do well,
handily and consistently. Poor traders are oftenand they would recognize that the best chance for
people who have insufficient knowledge, don't dome to do well is for them to help me.
their homework, do not have a strategic approachBut with a large public corporation, the trading of
that suits their goals and personality, and aretheir shares does not affect the running or financial
impatient.foundation of the corporation in the slightest. The
The "trading versus investing" dichotomy sets up acorporation got its capital at the IPO, via secondary
false premise: that there are only two ways toofferings of its stock, or by borrowing. If you and
participate in the market, by being a "buy and holder"your neighbor trade the shares back and forth, the
or by being a "trader." The word "trader" oftencorporation isn't affected and shouldn't care. There is
carries a negative connotation while "investor" has anothing morally virtuous about being a buy-and-holder.
halo.Trading is morally neutral. The question whether to
Where does one cross the line from being a "trader"trade or not is a business decision, pure and simple.
to an "investor"? Must you only buy--but neverEach party acts in his or her best interest as each
sell--to be an investor? If I turn my portfolio overperceives it. It is true that many investors who trade
ten percent per year, does that make me a trader?a lot, or who react emotionally to short-term "noise"
Twenty percent? One hundred percent? If I buy ain the market, do worse than others who hold their
stock and then sell it ten days later because its CEOinvestments longer. But so what? That does not
just got indicted, does that make me a trader rathermean that you have to make those mistakes. At
than an investor? Or does it make me a smarterother times, traders do better than buy-and-holders.
investor? If I hold most of my stocks at least aNeither approach is inherently better than the other.
year, does that make me an investor? Three years?The fact is, "investing" is the buying of a security. No
Five years?more and no less. If that security serves my
The fact is, there are places all along the spectrumpurposes for a long time, I may well hold it for years.
between the extremes of "buy-and-holder" toBut if the security fails to meet my reasonable
"trader." It does not advance the analysis to forceexpectations for it, or if the corporation that issued it
any person into one category or the other. Andscrews up and starts to hurt me, I owe no obligation
self-defeating decisions are not limited to traders.to continue to hold that security. I can sell it and look
Sometimes the most reckless thing you can do withfor a better place for my money. In fact, my
an investment is hold onto it. The bubble proved that.fiduciary duty to myself demands that I do so.
To me, the most sensible approach to being an