Coca-Cola - A Value Stock?

There has been much talk lately about Coca-Cola andproblem [with Ivester], though, was his tin ear.
its potential as a value stock - as it now spots aIvester was high in IQ but terribly short on EQ. A
dividend yield of 2.6% (which is the highest dividendself-made, stubborn, very shy son of North Georgia
yield since the late 1980s) and a P/E or less than 21 -millworkers, he had gotten where he was through
right at the bottom of its five-year low. Moreover,brains and hard work. He resented Keough's
the current price of approximately $43 a share is alsograndstanding, say people who knew him well, and
near the bottom of its nine-year range - (nine yearsnever fully appreciated the importance of Goizueta's
ago, the last former great CEO of Coke, Robertoalmost daily chats with directors. (Ivester declined to
Goizueta, was still at the helm of the company). Sure,comment.) Before long, head-down and full tilt in a
Coke has had its own set of problems, but it is aturbulent market, Ivester had alienated European
great company, they would argue - and heck,regulators, executives at big customers like Wal-Mart
Warren Buffett is also an owner of Coke shares.and Disney, and some big bottlers, including Coca-Cola
Don't get me wrong. I really like Coke as a company.Enterprises (on whose board sat Warren Buffett's
Its brand is as American as can be, and yet overson Howard). As he raced to put out fires, he
70% of all its sales are derived from outside of Northbecame increasingly isolated from his own board of
America. The country with the highest consumptiondirectors. One person was keeping in touch with
per capita of Coca-Cola is Mexico. According tothem, though, even in his retirement--Don Keough."
Interbrand.com, the brand name of Coca-Cola isBy December 1999, Ivester was out as CEO, after
worth approximately $67 billion and is the world'sboard members Warren Buffett and Herbert Allen
number one brand name. Who could forget thetold him that they have lost confidence in his
famous declaration of Coke's patriarch, Robertleadership. If anything, the next CEO Doug Daft
Woodruff? When the United States made thefared even worse than Ivester. Daft, an Australian
decision to enter World War II, he placed his hand onand who ran Coke's Japanese operations, did not
his heart and famously declared that he would "seehave a clue about the culture in Atlanta. In a sort of
that every man in uniform gets a bottle of Coca-Colaretaliation for Ivester's handling of Keough's loyalists,
for five cents wherever he is and whatever it costs."he also made many of Ivester's favorite executives
Of course, it didn't hurt that Woodruff's friend,leave the company. He also looked for quick fixes -
General Dwight Eisenhower, was a great promoter offor example, by trying to boost Coca-Cola's
Coke as well. By the time the war ended, hundredsprofitability by simply reducing headcount. By May of
of thousands of fighting men and women became alast year, Daft was out as CEO, and Neville Isdell - a
fan of Coca-Cola for the rest of their lives.former darling of Keough - came out of retirement
Under the leadership of Goizueta, Don Keough, andto run Coca-Cola.
Doug Ivester, Coca-Cola emerged as a growth andDescribed as "charismatic," Isdell may be the best
must-own stock during the late 1980s and up to theman for the job, but it is still too early to see what
mid to late 1990s. Keough was the great motivationalhe can do at this stage to revitalize the brand. Under
speaker, while Goizueta was unmatched in his abilitythe leadership of the trio of Goizueta, Keough, and
to "manage" the stock price and the Wall StreetIvester in the 1980s and much of the 1990s, the
analysts who covered the non-alcoholic beverageshares of Coca-Cola were a must-have and
industry and Coca-Cola. Goizueta had a habit ofCoca-Cola was regarded as a growth stock. Please
watching the stock price of Coca-Cola on an intradayalso keep in mind, however, that the run of KO
basis on a computer in Coke's headquarters. Whenduring that time also occurred in the midst of the
Warren Buffett was buying shares of Coca-Cola backgreatest bull market in U.S. stock market history.
in 1988, he and Keough figured it out by watchingAgain, readers should recall that I have always
the action of the trading and tracing those purchasescontended that we are still in a secular bear market -
to a broker based in Omaha. Ivester, a formera bear market not unsimilar to the 1966 to 1974
accountant, could have been regarded as a greatsecular bear market. While indices such as the Dow
financial alchemist. Under the financial leadership ofIndustrials, Transports, the S&P 400 and
Ivester, Coca-Cola bought out many of its bottlersS&P 600 have recovered nicely since the cyclical
and named the entity as Coca-Cola Enterprises. Thebear market bottom in October 2002, large caps
bottler went public in November 1986.such as Coca-Cola, Microsoft, or even GE have never
When Coca-Cola Enterprises (CCE) went public,really covered, and it is my belief that large caps will
Coca-Cola (the company) owned 49% of itscontinue to underperform once the bear reasserts
outstanding shares. Because of this, Coca-Cola haditself sometime this year. The dividend yield of 2.6%
the ability to raise syrup prices at will (the formermay or may not help, but who would want to hold a
agreement mandated that Coca-Cola only adjusted"value stock" once the Fed Funds rate is greater than
its price to match inflation for its syrup in the Northits dividend yield (as of right now, the Fed Funds rate
American market) - thus squeezing the profit marginsis 2.5%)? I really do not see deep value here. While a
of the bottler but increasing its own revenues andP/E of 20 is at the low end of its five-year range, it
profits. The stroke of genius was this: Because ofis interesting to note that Warren Buffett started
the fact that Coca-Cola only owned 49% of CCE, itbuying his shares of Coca-Cola in 1988 when the P/E
did not have to consolidate any of its financialwas only 13 (with a market cap of less than $15
statements with CCE. At the time, not one singlebillion) - and analysts at the time were proclaiming the
analyst totally understood this relationship.stock to be expensive! S&P currently projects a
Year-after-year, the company delivered. Goizuetafair value of Coca-Cola at $46, so there is really not
carefully (personally) managed all the information thata great margin of safety here.
came out of Coca-Cola. He would personally call WallWhile I believe Coca-Cola is a very strong brand and
Street analysts. Any analyst that dared to questionshould be a part of every investor's long-term core
him openly or disagree with Coca-Cola's earningsholdings, I do not believe it is a good time to buy at
projections would be rebuffed. One such analyst wasthis point. The growth in the stock price of KO was
Allan Kaplan from Merrill Lynch, who at one pointneither due to luck nor coincidence - it was due to
wrote a note to his clients observing that Coca-ColaGoizueta's shrewd management of the stock price,
may be depending on Japan for too much of itsKeough's salesmanship of the company, and Ivester's
profits. When Goizueta found out about the note, hefinancial genius - along with a roaring bull market more
responded angrily with letters to both Kaplan and histhan anything else. Despite the lack of leadership in
bosses at Merrill Lynch. Kaplan was banned fromCoca-Cola during the last seven years, part of the old
attending analyst meetings at Coca-Cola for moredream of KO being a growth stock has still hung on -
than a year. From that point on, analysts knew notfor far too long. For KO to be an attractive stock
to mess with Goizueta and Coca-Cola.once again, this author will need to see a more
Keough officially retired in 1993 while Goizueta passedcompelling valuation, such as a stock price of $25 to
away in October 1997 - succumbing to lung cancer.$30 a share. At some point, however, I believe KO
Ivester succeeded as CEO but behind the scenes,may be a glamour stock once again (as it still has a
the company was in disarrays. People loyal to Keoughlot of potential in China and India where only a total
and to Ivester clashed - with the former groupof about 850 million cases of Coke finished products
bearing the brunt of the hardship. The current CEO,were shipped in 2004, compared to 20 billion cases
Neville Isdell (who was loyal to Keough and the onlyfor the entire world), but not until some of the weak
true competitor for the top job back then) was senthands have been shaken out from the stock.
into "exile" to Great Britain to head up a bottler.Please let us know your thoughts and opinions. Is KO
According to a recent Fortune article, "The biggesta buy, hold or sell?